https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161401 Where a contract contains an arbitration clause and an arbitrator is validly appointed under section 11(6), the arbitral tribunal cannot reopen that appointment or refuse jurisdiction merely because a statutory tribunal regime is said to apply. The existence of a prior final appointment order means the tribunal must proceed with the reference, and the contrary jurisdictional objection cannot displace the arbitration clause. The document states that the award was not void on that ground and that the High Court's contrary view was set aside, confirming the primacy of the valid arbitral appointment over the claimed exclusive statutory forum. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161401 Where a contract contains an arbitration clause and an arbitrator is validly appointed under section 11(6), the arbitral tribunal cannot reopen that appointment or refuse jurisdiction merely because a statutory tribunal regime is said to apply. The existence of a prior final appointment order means the tribunal must proceed with the reference, and the contrary jurisdictional objection cannot displace the arbitration clause. The document states that the award was not void on that ground and that the High Court's contrary view was set aside, confirming the primacy of the valid arbitral appointment over the claimed exclusive statutory forum. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161401