https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161401 The Supreme Court ruled that the arbitrator appointed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act had valid jurisdiction, rejecting the High Court's decision that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction. The Court emphasized that once appointed by the Chief Justice or designate, the tribunal's jurisdiction cannot be questioned. The High Court's order was set aside, and the District Judge was directed to proceed with the application under section 34 of the Act on its merits. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161401 The Supreme Court ruled that the arbitrator appointed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act had valid jurisdiction, rejecting the High Court's decision that the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction. The Court emphasized that once appointed by the Chief Justice or designate, the tribunal's jurisdiction cannot be questioned. The High Court's order was set aside, and the District Judge was directed to proceed with the application under section 34 of the Act on its merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161401