https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242607 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision on the refund claim based on the observations made in the judgment. The Tribunal held that the refund claim could not have been rejected solely based on the substitution of provisions of Notification No.15/2009. It directed the original authority to verify the receipt of services for invoices raised in the wrong address and advised the Appellant to provide evidence for payment of service tax to allow the benefit. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242607 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision on the refund claim based on the observations made in the judgment. The Tribunal held that the refund claim could not have been rejected solely based on the substitution of provisions of Notification No.15/2009. It directed the original authority to verify the receipt of services for invoices raised in the wrong address and advised the Appellant to provide evidence for payment of service tax to allow the benefit. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242607