<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 823 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242606</link>
    <description>Service tax refund on billed amounts not actually received was held not to be denied merely because the debt had not been written off. The analysis treated service tax as payable, on these facts, only on receipt of monetary consideration, and distinguished central excise principles where liability arises on manufacture or removal. Section 11B and unjust enrichment were considered, but the refund claim had to turn on verification of whether the consideration was in fact received. The claim was therefore maintainable in principle, subject to that factual verification, and the appeal was not successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 823 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242606</link>
      <description>Service tax refund on billed amounts not actually received was held not to be denied merely because the debt had not been written off. The analysis treated service tax as payable, on these facts, only on receipt of monetary consideration, and distinguished central excise principles where liability arises on manufacture or removal. Section 11B and unjust enrichment were considered, but the refund claim had to turn on verification of whether the consideration was in fact received. The claim was therefore maintainable in principle, subject to that factual verification, and the appeal was not successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>