https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242579 The statutory appeal under the foreign exchange law was wide enough to cover an adjudication order exonerating some noticees while adverse findings were made against others, and the deposit proviso did not narrow that appellate remedy. Because the grievance had already been taken before the Appellate Tribunal and rejected, the same challenge could not be pursued again in writ jurisdiction. The High Court therefore held that the writ petition was not maintainable where an effective statutory appeal existed and had been invoked, and declined to entertain the attack on the exoneration order. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:37:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242579 The statutory appeal under the foreign exchange law was wide enough to cover an adjudication order exonerating some noticees while adverse findings were made against others, and the deposit proviso did not narrow that appellate remedy. Because the grievance had already been taken before the Appellate Tribunal and rejected, the same challenge could not be pursued again in writ jurisdiction. The High Court therefore held that the writ petition was not maintainable where an effective statutory appeal existed and had been invoked, and declined to entertain the attack on the exoneration order. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242579