<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 795 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242578</link>
    <description>The court upheld the authorities&#039; decision on the valuation of diamond jewellery for customs duty purposes at 14,500 British Pounds, dismissing the petition challenging the penalty reduction and valuation. Confiscation and penalties were imposed under relevant sections of the Customs Act for misdeclaration and undeclaration of jewellery to evade customs duty. The court affirmed the orders of confiscation and redemption, finding no merit in the petitioners&#039; contentions regarding valuation discrepancies and misrepresentation for VAT refund purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 795 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242578</link>
      <description>The court upheld the authorities&#039; decision on the valuation of diamond jewellery for customs duty purposes at 14,500 British Pounds, dismissing the petition challenging the penalty reduction and valuation. Confiscation and penalties were imposed under relevant sections of the Customs Act for misdeclaration and undeclaration of jewellery to evade customs duty. The court affirmed the orders of confiscation and redemption, finding no merit in the petitioners&#039; contentions regarding valuation discrepancies and misrepresentation for VAT refund purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>