<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 788 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242571</link>
    <description>The Court allowed compounding of the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act post-conviction, following guidelines set by the SC. The respondent was acquitted upon depositing 15% of the cheque amount with the Delhi Legal Services Authority within a month, in line with the SC&#039;s directives to streamline the process and ease the burden on the Justice Delivery System.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 788 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242571</link>
      <description>The Court allowed compounding of the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act post-conviction, following guidelines set by the SC. The respondent was acquitted upon depositing 15% of the cheque amount with the Delhi Legal Services Authority within a month, in line with the SC&#039;s directives to streamline the process and ease the burden on the Justice Delivery System.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>