<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 780 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s application for waiver and stay of adjudged dues on goods cleared as kits, citing contradictions in the date of manufacture and accuracy of information provided. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within 6 weeks, with compliance to be reported to the Deputy Registrar. Waiver and stay were granted for penalties and remaining duty and interest contingent upon compliance, potentially reducing the outstanding duty to around Rs. 11.25 lakhs. The judgment underscored the importance of accurate record-keeping and providing sufficient proof to support claims in disputed matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 780 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s application for waiver and stay of adjudged dues on goods cleared as kits, citing contradictions in the date of manufacture and accuracy of information provided. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within 6 weeks, with compliance to be reported to the Deputy Registrar. Waiver and stay were granted for penalties and remaining duty and interest contingent upon compliance, potentially reducing the outstanding duty to around Rs. 11.25 lakhs. The judgment underscored the importance of accurate record-keeping and providing sufficient proof to support claims in disputed matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>