<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 771 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs.28,69,419/- for the appellant involved in the dispute regarding the classification of their activity related to the manufacturing process of &#039;Barbie Dolls&#039; and &#039;Hot Wheel Kits&#039;. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s assembly of goods in their factory premises before clearance constitutes manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the waiver and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal, as decided by judges Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 771 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs.28,69,419/- for the appellant involved in the dispute regarding the classification of their activity related to the manufacturing process of &#039;Barbie Dolls&#039; and &#039;Hot Wheel Kits&#039;. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s assembly of goods in their factory premises before clearance constitutes manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the waiver and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal, as decided by judges Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>