<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 768 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242551</link>
    <description>Packing salt into smaller packs and delivering it on principals&#039; instructions was examined on a prima facie basis and found not to fall within Clearing and Forwarding Agents Service. The deposits already made were treated as sufficient compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 768 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242551</link>
      <description>Packing salt into smaller packs and delivering it on principals&#039; instructions was examined on a prima facie basis and found not to fall within Clearing and Forwarding Agents Service. The deposits already made were treated as sufficient compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>