<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 765 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242548</link>
    <description>The entertainment tax framework required prior information before holding taxable entertainment, together with compliance with the prescribed security regime, but it did not create any requirement to obtain a No Objection Certificate. The charging, information, security, exemption, return, payment and assessment provisions were read as a complete code: at the initial stage the authority could take only a prima facie view to ensure compliance, require furnishing or enhancement of security, and prohibit the event on breach. The statutory scheme contemplated prior intimation and revenue protection, not pre-clearance by way of an NOC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 765 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242548</link>
      <description>The entertainment tax framework required prior information before holding taxable entertainment, together with compliance with the prescribed security regime, but it did not create any requirement to obtain a No Objection Certificate. The charging, information, security, exemption, return, payment and assessment provisions were read as a complete code: at the initial stage the authority could take only a prima facie view to ensure compliance, require furnishing or enhancement of security, and prohibit the event on breach. The statutory scheme contemplated prior intimation and revenue protection, not pre-clearance by way of an NOC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>