<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for further investigation to establish the direct attribution of interest expenses to specific income sources under section 14A. It directed authorities to limit disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) to actual expenditure incurred by the assessee, emphasizing that disallowance cannot exceed the total claimed amount. The Tribunal held that authorities lacked the authority to alter the calculation provided in Rule 8D(2)(iii), emphasizing that the prescribed calculation should not be disturbed. The Tribunal partly allowed appeals of both parties for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of detailed investigations and adherence to actual expenditure limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:14:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for further investigation to establish the direct attribution of interest expenses to specific income sources under section 14A. It directed authorities to limit disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) to actual expenditure incurred by the assessee, emphasizing that disallowance cannot exceed the total claimed amount. The Tribunal held that authorities lacked the authority to alter the calculation provided in Rule 8D(2)(iii), emphasizing that the prescribed calculation should not be disturbed. The Tribunal partly allowed appeals of both parties for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of detailed investigations and adherence to actual expenditure limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>