https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242533 The Tribunal rejected the applicants' requests for rectification/recall of its order, emphasizing that the applicants were essentially seeking a review of the decision, which was not allowed under the relevant Act. The Tribunal noted that the applicants' grievances focused on the nature of the land and references in the order, stating that it had duly considered all arguments. Given the previous rejection of similar applications and the applicants' repeated attempts at seeking review, the Tribunal found no merit in the present applications and dismissed them, affirming that seeking a review through such applications was impermissible. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:14:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242533 The Tribunal rejected the applicants' requests for rectification/recall of its order, emphasizing that the applicants were essentially seeking a review of the decision, which was not allowed under the relevant Act. The Tribunal noted that the applicants' grievances focused on the nature of the land and references in the order, stating that it had duly considered all arguments. Given the previous rejection of similar applications and the applicants' repeated attempts at seeking review, the Tribunal found no merit in the present applications and dismissed them, affirming that seeking a review through such applications was impermissible. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242533