https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242517 A principal arbitration agreement remains enforceable where later agreements do not clearly extinguish it, and a jurisdiction clause in a supplementary agreement does not by itself abrogate the earlier arbitration clause. The later contracts were treated as supplementary arrangements, while the principal agreement's terms continued to bind the parties; the arbitration clause therefore remained valid and operative. Once that clause was upheld, a civil suit seeking a declaration that the arbitration agreement was void and an injunction restraining the arbitral proceedings was not maintainable, because a party cannot bypass the agreed arbitral forum to obstruct reference to arbitration. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:11:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242517 A principal arbitration agreement remains enforceable where later agreements do not clearly extinguish it, and a jurisdiction clause in a supplementary agreement does not by itself abrogate the earlier arbitration clause. The later contracts were treated as supplementary arrangements, while the principal agreement's terms continued to bind the parties; the arbitration clause therefore remained valid and operative. Once that clause was upheld, a civil suit seeking a declaration that the arbitration agreement was void and an injunction restraining the arbitral proceedings was not maintainable, because a party cannot bypass the agreed arbitral forum to obstruct reference to arbitration. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242517