<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161377</link>
    <description>For disqualification under Article 191(1)(a), the office must be directly under the Government; indirect governmental control over a separate company is not enough. The SC noted that employees of the Mysore Iron &amp; Steel Works became company employees after transfer to a private limited company, with no proof of a retained Government lien, lent service, or continuing Government post, and a Civil List entry was insufficient to show Government service. Section 10 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was treated as reinforcing that only specified offices in certain companies are covered. The election challenge therefore failed on the disqualification ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161377</link>
      <description>For disqualification under Article 191(1)(a), the office must be directly under the Government; indirect governmental control over a separate company is not enough. The SC noted that employees of the Mysore Iron &amp; Steel Works became company employees after transfer to a private limited company, with no proof of a retained Government lien, lent service, or continuing Government post, and a Civil List entry was insufficient to show Government service. Section 10 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was treated as reinforcing that only specified offices in certain companies are covered. The election challenge therefore failed on the disqualification ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>