<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 443 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161374</link>
    <description>An official liquidator selling a company&#039;s assets under court sanction does not fall within the Kerala General Sales Tax Act definition of &quot;dealer&quot; unless the sales form part of a business carried on with an independent intention to trade. The court applied the settled test that the main and dominant activity must amount to business; sales made in winding up are only incidental to the liquidator&#039;s statutory duty and are not profit-making business. Mere official appointment does not change the character of the function. The liquidator was therefore not treated as a dealer and was not required to collect sales tax on the liquidation sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 443 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161374</link>
      <description>An official liquidator selling a company&#039;s assets under court sanction does not fall within the Kerala General Sales Tax Act definition of &quot;dealer&quot; unless the sales form part of a business carried on with an independent intention to trade. The court applied the settled test that the main and dominant activity must amount to business; sales made in winding up are only incidental to the liquidator&#039;s statutory duty and are not profit-making business. Mere official appointment does not change the character of the function. The liquidator was therefore not treated as a dealer and was not required to collect sales tax on the liquidation sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>