<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161372</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax and the Appellate Tribunal, Sales Tax, regarding demands raised under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 for the assessment year 1992-93 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to produce declaration forms for sales to registered dealers. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3.5 lakhs by a specified date, with a stay on the realization of the balance until the disposal of the first appeal. The petitioner was required to provide proof of payment and appear before the Additional Commissioner for further proceedings, emphasizing compliance with the orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161372</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax and the Appellate Tribunal, Sales Tax, regarding demands raised under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 for the assessment year 1992-93 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to produce declaration forms for sales to registered dealers. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 3.5 lakhs by a specified date, with a stay on the realization of the balance until the disposal of the first appeal. The petitioner was required to provide proof of payment and appear before the Additional Commissioner for further proceedings, emphasizing compliance with the orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>