<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 954 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161347</link>
    <description>In a suo motu revision under sales tax law, objections could not be raised against the first appellate authority&#039;s finding on annual sales turnover when that issue was outside the scope of the revision and no second appeal had been filed. The Tribunal also noted that rejection of accounts was justified by defects such as suppression of daily sales, absence of bills and stock records, and other surrounding circumstances, supporting a best judgment assessment. The estimation of annual turnover and the revised determination under section 7-A were therefore upheld as based on relevant material and not shown to be arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:56:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 954 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161347</link>
      <description>In a suo motu revision under sales tax law, objections could not be raised against the first appellate authority&#039;s finding on annual sales turnover when that issue was outside the scope of the revision and no second appeal had been filed. The Tribunal also noted that rejection of accounts was justified by defects such as suppression of daily sales, absence of bills and stock records, and other surrounding circumstances, supporting a best judgment assessment. The estimation of annual turnover and the revised determination under section 7-A were therefore upheld as based on relevant material and not shown to be arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>