https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161336 Statutory appeal limitation cannot be extended in writ jurisdiction merely because Article 226 is invoked. Where the legislature has fixed a time limit for appeal and provided no further extension, the court will not rewrite the statute by adding a grace period. Illness of the person in charge and the shortness of the delay were held insufficient to justify condonation against the statutory bar. The principle that special limitation provisions may exclude the general law of limitation by necessary implication was accepted, and the refusal to condone delay was upheld. en-us Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:44:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161336 Statutory appeal limitation cannot be extended in writ jurisdiction merely because Article 226 is invoked. Where the legislature has fixed a time limit for appeal and provided no further extension, the court will not rewrite the statute by adding a grace period. Illness of the person in charge and the shortness of the delay were held insufficient to justify condonation against the statutory bar. The principle that special limitation provisions may exclude the general law of limitation by necessary implication was accepted, and the refusal to condone delay was upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161336