<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellate order, determining that filling ash into bulkers/tankers is ancillary to goods transportation, not a separate &quot;Cargo Handling Service.&quot; The decision was based on the examination of the parties&#039; agreement, a photograph, and relevant legal provisions, emphasizing that the specific nature of the service governs classification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and related applications were disposed of in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellate order, determining that filling ash into bulkers/tankers is ancillary to goods transportation, not a separate &quot;Cargo Handling Service.&quot; The decision was based on the examination of the parties&#039; agreement, a photograph, and relevant legal provisions, emphasizing that the specific nature of the service governs classification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and related applications were disposed of in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>