https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242496 The tribunal found no prima facie case for the appellant in a Service Tax dispute concerning the nature of services provided to KSRTC, determining that the activity likely falls under "rent-a-cab service" rather than "supply of tangible goods service." Despite the appellant's claims of limitation and financial hardships, the tribunal directed a 50% pre-deposit of the demanded tax within six weeks for waiver and stay, emphasizing compliance. The decision was based on the contract terms and nature of the appellant's activity, ultimately granting partial relief on the penalty and remaining tax amount. en-us Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:53:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242496 The tribunal found no prima facie case for the appellant in a Service Tax dispute concerning the nature of services provided to KSRTC, determining that the activity likely falls under "rent-a-cab service" rather than "supply of tangible goods service." Despite the appellant's claims of limitation and financial hardships, the tribunal directed a 50% pre-deposit of the demanded tax within six weeks for waiver and stay, emphasizing compliance. The decision was based on the contract terms and nature of the appellant's activity, ultimately granting partial relief on the penalty and remaining tax amount. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242496