https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242481 The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision to disallow business promotion expenses and ad-hoc disallowance of conveyance and general office expenses for the assessment year 2008-2009. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the expenses were wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal found the CIT (A)'s decisions reasonable and just, affirming the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. en-us Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:52:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242481 The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision to disallow business promotion expenses and ad-hoc disallowance of conveyance and general office expenses for the assessment year 2008-2009. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the expenses were wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal found the CIT (A)'s decisions reasonable and just, affirming the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242481