<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of payment made to SIDBI towards reimbursement of deputed personnel cost under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-2009. The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) should not apply to reimbursements, citing relevant precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of TDS for late payments to the Government account, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision based on the retrospective application of an amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2010. The issues related to the treatment of income as income from other sources were not pursued by the appellant and were consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of payment made to SIDBI towards reimbursement of deputed personnel cost under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-2009. The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) should not apply to reimbursements, citing relevant precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the disallowance of TDS for late payments to the Government account, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision based on the retrospective application of an amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2010. The issues related to the treatment of income as income from other sources were not pursued by the appellant and were consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>