<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242477</link>
    <description>The appeal by Revenue challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-Tax Act for Rs.5,41,337 was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the tax effect falling below the prescribed limit of Rs.3 lakhs. The Cross-Objection by the Assessee was also dismissed as it was barred by a 13-day limitation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order, resulting in the dismissal of both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Assessee&#039;s Cross-Objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 695 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242477</link>
      <description>The appeal by Revenue challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-Tax Act for Rs.5,41,337 was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the tax effect falling below the prescribed limit of Rs.3 lakhs. The Cross-Objection by the Assessee was also dismissed as it was barred by a 13-day limitation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order, resulting in the dismissal of both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Assessee&#039;s Cross-Objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>