<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 694 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the first issue back to the Assessing Officer for further examination regarding disallowance of compensation from customers. The second issue, concerning disallowance of prior period expenses, was decided in favor of the assessee, upholding the deletion of disallowance based on consistent accounting practices and past decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 694 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the first issue back to the Assessing Officer for further examination regarding disallowance of compensation from customers. The second issue, concerning disallowance of prior period expenses, was decided in favor of the assessee, upholding the deletion of disallowance based on consistent accounting practices and past decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>