https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242474 Disputed questions over service of opportunity notice and supply of relied upon documents were treated as triable matters, so they were not suitable for quashing at the threshold in inherent jurisdiction. The plea that there was no intentional or wilful default was also left for trial, while the complaint's specific averments on directors' role were considered sufficient to continue proceedings prima facie. The challenge based on a later circular was not accepted for present interference because its retrospective operation was not shown, and questions of applicability and vicarious liability were left to be examined at the stage of charge or notice. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:51:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242474 Disputed questions over service of opportunity notice and supply of relied upon documents were treated as triable matters, so they were not suitable for quashing at the threshold in inherent jurisdiction. The plea that there was no intentional or wilful default was also left for trial, while the complaint's specific averments on directors' role were considered sufficient to continue proceedings prima facie. The challenge based on a later circular was not accepted for present interference because its retrospective operation was not shown, and questions of applicability and vicarious liability were left to be examined at the stage of charge or notice. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242474