<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 689 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242471</link>
    <description>Machinery for preparing cattle feed was treated as prima facie classifiable under Heading 8436 and sub-heading 8436 10 00 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, rather than under Heading 8438 as proposed by the Revenue. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the assessee had shown a prima facie case for interim protection. The appellant was therefore entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 689 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242471</link>
      <description>Machinery for preparing cattle feed was treated as prima facie classifiable under Heading 8436 and sub-heading 8436 10 00 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, rather than under Heading 8438 as proposed by the Revenue. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the assessee had shown a prima facie case for interim protection. The appellant was therefore entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>