https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242467 Prior use and goodwill in the mark "THE NOODLE HOUSE", supported by trademark filings, sales invoices, turnover records and lease documents, justified passing off relief where the defendant sought to use the identical mark for the same restaurant services in the same commercial area, creating a likelihood of confusion and deception. The court held that proof of prior user and probable confusion was sufficient for a permanent injunction. Damages were refused because the plaintiff showed no actual loss, the period before ex parte restraint was short, and there was no material that the defendant had commenced operations or caused measurable harm. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:50:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242467 Prior use and goodwill in the mark "THE NOODLE HOUSE", supported by trademark filings, sales invoices, turnover records and lease documents, justified passing off relief where the defendant sought to use the identical mark for the same restaurant services in the same commercial area, creating a likelihood of confusion and deception. The court held that proof of prior user and probable confusion was sufficient for a permanent injunction. Damages were refused because the plaintiff showed no actual loss, the period before ex parte restraint was short, and there was no material that the defendant had commenced operations or caused measurable harm. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242467