<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 682 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242464</link>
    <description>A request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was considered in a dispute over a 100% EOU&#039;s clearance of goods into the Domestic Tariff Area under Notification No. 2/94-CE. The record showed that the High Court had already granted and continued an interim stay in the connected writ petition. In light of that subsisting stay, further coercive recovery proceedings in the appeal were not warranted at that stage, and the stay application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:46:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 682 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242464</link>
      <description>A request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was considered in a dispute over a 100% EOU&#039;s clearance of goods into the Domestic Tariff Area under Notification No. 2/94-CE. The record showed that the High Court had already granted and continued an interim stay in the connected writ petition. In light of that subsisting stay, further coercive recovery proceedings in the appeal were not warranted at that stage, and the stay application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>