https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242460 The appellant contested the valuation of goods for duty calculation based on transaction value versus Valuation Rules, invoking an extended period for demand, and disclosing agreement details. The appellant argued that the transaction value was correct under the Central Excise Act, challenging the applicability of Valuation Rules. They also disputed the invocation of the extended period, citing prior disclosure of manufacturing processes. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the appellant's value calculation and financial difficulties but directed a specific predeposit for the appeal hearing, granting a stay on recovery of remaining duty, interest, and penalty. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:46:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242460 The appellant contested the valuation of goods for duty calculation based on transaction value versus Valuation Rules, invoking an extended period for demand, and disclosing agreement details. The appellant argued that the transaction value was correct under the Central Excise Act, challenging the applicability of Valuation Rules. They also disputed the invocation of the extended period, citing prior disclosure of manufacturing processes. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the appellant's value calculation and financial difficulties but directed a specific predeposit for the appeal hearing, granting a stay on recovery of remaining duty, interest, and penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242460