https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242451 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was not upheld as the appellant was found eligible for abatement under a specific Notification. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had acted in good faith, regularly paid taxes, and there was no evidence of suppression or misdeclaration. Additionally, the extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable due to factors such as abatement on invoices and legal decisions supporting exclusion of goods value in service tax calculation. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242451 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was not upheld as the appellant was found eligible for abatement under a specific Notification. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had acted in good faith, regularly paid taxes, and there was no evidence of suppression or misdeclaration. Additionally, the extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable due to factors such as abatement on invoices and legal decisions supporting exclusion of goods value in service tax calculation. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242451