<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1300 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty for acknowledging a debt to M/s. Tewin Plastics Ltd., UK, due to lack of corroborative evidence. However, penalties for other violations were upheld, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence and legal requirements for an acknowledgment of debt to establish enforceable rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1300 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty for acknowledging a debt to M/s. Tewin Plastics Ltd., UK, due to lack of corroborative evidence. However, penalties for other violations were upheld, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence and legal requirements for an acknowledgment of debt to establish enforceable rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>