<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 640 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242421</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice given to the appellant did not comply with the requirements of Section 50 of the NDPS Act as it failed to inform the appellant of his right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Consequently, the recovery of ganja was deemed illegal. The appellant was acquitted, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The appellant was ordered to be released from jail unless required in another case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 640 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242421</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice given to the appellant did not comply with the requirements of Section 50 of the NDPS Act as it failed to inform the appellant of his right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Consequently, the recovery of ganja was deemed illegal. The appellant was acquitted, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The appellant was ordered to be released from jail unless required in another case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>