<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s order was in violation of natural justice principles due to inadequate cross-examination opportunities for the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of fair hearings. The Tribunal stressed the need for proper consideration of cross-examination requests to ensure a balanced adjudication process. Additionally, one judge highlighted the importance of thorough examination of evidence and the potential impact on revenue interests in determining the refund of deposited amounts pending the new adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 639 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s order was in violation of natural justice principles due to inadequate cross-examination opportunities for the appellants. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of fair hearings. The Tribunal stressed the need for proper consideration of cross-examination requests to ensure a balanced adjudication process. Additionally, one judge highlighted the importance of thorough examination of evidence and the potential impact on revenue interests in determining the refund of deposited amounts pending the new adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>