<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 638 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242419</link>
    <description>Imported e-bikes cleared in CKD condition but assessed as complete e-bikes remained eligible for refund of additional customs duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. Once customs authorities had classified and levied duty on the goods as e-bikes under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the Revenue could not later re-characterise them as parts to deny refund. The Board Circular and Chapter Note 6 of Section XVII did not alter the admitted position that the goods were imported, assembled, and sold as e-bikes on payment of VAT. The refund claim was therefore admissible and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 638 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242419</link>
      <description>Imported e-bikes cleared in CKD condition but assessed as complete e-bikes remained eligible for refund of additional customs duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. Once customs authorities had classified and levied duty on the goods as e-bikes under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the Revenue could not later re-characterise them as parts to deny refund. The Board Circular and Chapter Note 6 of Section XVII did not alter the admitted position that the goods were imported, assembled, and sold as e-bikes on payment of VAT. The refund claim was therefore admissible and the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>