<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 633 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242414</link>
    <description>Section 9 interim protection may be sought before a court with jurisdiction where an earlier section 11 application was not filed before a &quot;court&quot; as defined under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and therefore does not trigger the exclusive-jurisdiction rule. Courts may apply principles underlying attachment before judgment to prevent dissipation of assets that could frustrate an arbitral award, including asset disclosure and limited protective directions affecting third parties owing money to respondents. An express contractual indemnity may support interim protection before liability is finally crystallised or paid where the agreement makes the indemnity immediately operative upon incurrence of liability and preserves it for a stated survival period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 633 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242414</link>
      <description>Section 9 interim protection may be sought before a court with jurisdiction where an earlier section 11 application was not filed before a &quot;court&quot; as defined under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and therefore does not trigger the exclusive-jurisdiction rule. Courts may apply principles underlying attachment before judgment to prevent dissipation of assets that could frustrate an arbitral award, including asset disclosure and limited protective directions affecting third parties owing money to respondents. An express contractual indemnity may support interim protection before liability is finally crystallised or paid where the agreement makes the indemnity immediately operative upon incurrence of liability and preserves it for a stated survival period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>