<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 627 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242408</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for CENVAT credit was found where the record indicated fabricated items and the use of plates and similar materials in constructing a sulphuric acid plant. The dispute on admissibility and limitation also had arguable support in existing decisions, and the amount already deposited was treated as sufficient at the appeal stage. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the disputed amount was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 627 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242408</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for CENVAT credit was found where the record indicated fabricated items and the use of plates and similar materials in constructing a sulphuric acid plant. The dispute on admissibility and limitation also had arguable support in existing decisions, and the amount already deposited was treated as sufficient at the appeal stage. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the disputed amount was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>