<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 915 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161317</link>
    <description>The court found the imposition of a penalty without a formal order under sub-section (4) of section 28A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 to be illegal and unauthorized. The petitioner&#039;s request for a copy of the order was granted, and the third respondent was directed to refund the penalty amount within two weeks. The court emphasized the necessity for strict compliance with the law by authorities with statutory powers to prevent arbitrary exercises of power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 915 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161317</link>
      <description>The court found the imposition of a penalty without a formal order under sub-section (4) of section 28A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 to be illegal and unauthorized. The petitioner&#039;s request for a copy of the order was granted, and the third respondent was directed to refund the penalty amount within two weeks. The court emphasized the necessity for strict compliance with the law by authorities with statutory powers to prevent arbitrary exercises of power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>