<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 914 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161315</link>
    <description>A challenge to an appellate order was found not maintainable after the order had attained finality, because no appeal had been filed against it and the explanation for not pursuing the further remedy was rejected. The petition was also misdirected, as it attacked the original appellate order rather than the later refusal to rectify under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. On the merits, the assessment formula adopted by the assessing authority had already been examined and upheld as lawful, and no legal infirmity or jurisdictional error was shown to justify interference. The challenge was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 914 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161315</link>
      <description>A challenge to an appellate order was found not maintainable after the order had attained finality, because no appeal had been filed against it and the explanation for not pursuing the further remedy was rejected. The petition was also misdirected, as it attacked the original appellate order rather than the later refusal to rectify under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. On the merits, the assessment formula adopted by the assessing authority had already been examined and upheld as lawful, and no legal infirmity or jurisdictional error was shown to justify interference. The challenge was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>