<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 605 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242385</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioners&#039; request for a blanket stay against the respondents in conducting the enquiry, emphasizing the need to avoid further delays and loss of evidence. The court highlighted that the proceedings should continue despite pending Supreme Court decisions and allegations of interpolation in the minutes. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs, allowing the petitioners time to file a fresh writ petition to seek interim reliefs regarding the application of the new procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 605 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242385</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioners&#039; request for a blanket stay against the respondents in conducting the enquiry, emphasizing the need to avoid further delays and loss of evidence. The court highlighted that the proceedings should continue despite pending Supreme Court decisions and allegations of interpolation in the minutes. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs, allowing the petitioners time to file a fresh writ petition to seek interim reliefs regarding the application of the new procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>