<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 601 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242381</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s decision regarding the assessment of capital gain, confirming that the property transfer occurred in the assessment year 2007-08. The tribunal also set aside the order on the disallowance of improvement costs, directing the CIT(A) to issue a notice of enhancement to the assessee and decide the matter in accordance with the law. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing procedural compliance and correct application of the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 601 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242381</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s decision regarding the assessment of capital gain, confirming that the property transfer occurred in the assessment year 2007-08. The tribunal also set aside the order on the disallowance of improvement costs, directing the CIT(A) to issue a notice of enhancement to the assessee and decide the matter in accordance with the law. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing procedural compliance and correct application of the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>