https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242366 The appeal challenged the Adjudicating Authority's decision on violations of FERA provisions, resulting in penalties of Rs. 25,000 for Smt. Gurmej Kaur and Rs. 7,00,000 for Harbhajan Singh, along with confiscation orders. The appellant disputed the evidence against Harbhajan Singh, lack of cross-examination opportunity, and admissibility of recovered documents. The Tribunal reviewed the penalties and confiscation orders, considering the burden of proof, evidence admissibility, and principles of natural justice, ultimately upholding the Adjudicating Authority's decision on legal grounds. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:12:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242366 The appeal challenged the Adjudicating Authority's decision on violations of FERA provisions, resulting in penalties of Rs. 25,000 for Smt. Gurmej Kaur and Rs. 7,00,000 for Harbhajan Singh, along with confiscation orders. The appellant disputed the evidence against Harbhajan Singh, lack of cross-examination opportunity, and admissibility of recovered documents. The Tribunal reviewed the penalties and confiscation orders, considering the burden of proof, evidence admissibility, and principles of natural justice, ultimately upholding the Adjudicating Authority's decision on legal grounds. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242366