<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 583 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242362</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to prohibit a Custom House Agent from operating at Pipavav Port, citing regulatory powers and non-appealability of the administrative order. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments on jurisdictional issues and appealability based on High Court directions, the Tribunal emphasized adherence to administrative decisions and legal precedents, ultimately rejecting the appeal and underscoring the significance of judicial discipline in customs-related appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 583 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242362</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to prohibit a Custom House Agent from operating at Pipavav Port, citing regulatory powers and non-appealability of the administrative order. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments on jurisdictional issues and appealability based on High Court directions, the Tribunal emphasized adherence to administrative decisions and legal precedents, ultimately rejecting the appeal and underscoring the significance of judicial discipline in customs-related appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>