<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 580 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242359</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and quashing the proceedings against the appellants in both cases. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining the distinction between separate legal entities and clarified the requirements for prosecution under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 580 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242359</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and quashing the proceedings against the appellants in both cases. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining the distinction between separate legal entities and clarified the requirements for prosecution under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>