<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 577 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242356</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appellants&#039; miscellaneous applications for modification of the stay order, directing M/s. Shri Guru Nank Dev Engineers and M/s. Gobind Expeller Company Pvt. Ltd. to deposit 50% of the duty demand within six weeks to safeguard the Revenue&#039;s interests, despite the appellants&#039; financial constraints not warranting a total waiver of the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal emphasized that the initial contentions were duly considered and highlighted the need to balance financial difficulties with Revenue protection. Compliance was required within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:09:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 577 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242356</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appellants&#039; miscellaneous applications for modification of the stay order, directing M/s. Shri Guru Nank Dev Engineers and M/s. Gobind Expeller Company Pvt. Ltd. to deposit 50% of the duty demand within six weeks to safeguard the Revenue&#039;s interests, despite the appellants&#039; financial constraints not warranting a total waiver of the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal emphasized that the initial contentions were duly considered and highlighted the need to balance financial difficulties with Revenue protection. Compliance was required within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>