<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 574 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242353</link>
    <description>Imported Zircon Ore/Concentrate was classified as Zirconium Ore because uncontroverted expert opinions from technical bodies supported that description and the goods&#039; specifications matched the relevant standard. The same view had already been taken in an identical matter involving the same product, and that reasoning was followed. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE was held available, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 574 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242353</link>
      <description>Imported Zircon Ore/Concentrate was classified as Zirconium Ore because uncontroverted expert opinions from technical bodies supported that description and the goods&#039; specifications matched the relevant standard. The same view had already been taken in an identical matter involving the same product, and that reasoning was followed. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-CE was held available, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>