<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 808 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161301</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notices demanding sales tax at 9% on maize seeds, ruling that the Commissioner lacked authority to issue such directions. The assessing authority must independently determine the tax rate through proper assessment procedures. The writ application was allowed, and the notices were quashed, with the court refraining from expressing an opinion on the applicable tax rate, leaving it to the assessing authority to decide in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 808 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161301</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notices demanding sales tax at 9% on maize seeds, ruling that the Commissioner lacked authority to issue such directions. The assessing authority must independently determine the tax rate through proper assessment procedures. The writ application was allowed, and the notices were quashed, with the court refraining from expressing an opinion on the applicable tax rate, leaving it to the assessing authority to decide in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>