<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 572 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161300</link>
    <description>A one-time regulatory mopping-up of Exim scrips under RBI directions was not treated as business activity for purchase-tax purposes because the dealings were brief, non-recurring, and lacked the continuity, regularity and profit motive ordinarily associated with business. The receipt of the scrips was also characterised as a surrender rather than a purchase, since the scheme required immediate cancellation and return to the issuing authority, removing the scrips from commercial circulation. On that basis, the transaction did not attract section 4(6)(iii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and purchase tax could not be levied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 572 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161300</link>
      <description>A one-time regulatory mopping-up of Exim scrips under RBI directions was not treated as business activity for purchase-tax purposes because the dealings were brief, non-recurring, and lacked the continuity, regularity and profit motive ordinarily associated with business. The receipt of the scrips was also characterised as a surrender rather than a purchase, since the scheme required immediate cancellation and return to the issuing authority, removing the scrips from commercial circulation. On that basis, the transaction did not attract section 4(6)(iii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and purchase tax could not be levied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>