<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 675 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161289</link>
    <description>The petitioner was denied exemptions under the notifications dated September 1, 1964, and March 25, 1989, as the canteens were operated by independent contractors for profit, and the total turnover exceeded the prescribed limit. The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to reassess penalties based on the petitioner&#039;s records and directed a reconsideration in line with relevant legal precedents. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with connected miscellaneous petitions closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 675 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161289</link>
      <description>The petitioner was denied exemptions under the notifications dated September 1, 1964, and March 25, 1989, as the canteens were operated by independent contractors for profit, and the total turnover exceeded the prescribed limit. The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision to reassess penalties based on the petitioner&#039;s records and directed a reconsideration in line with relevant legal precedents. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with connected miscellaneous petitions closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>