<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161287</link>
    <description>The court upheld the levy of purchase tax on the sale of chillies under section 7-A of the TNGST Act, confirming it as a local sale and the penultimate sale under section 5(3) of the CST Act. The tax on the sale of jaggery was also upheld due to lack of proof of export. However, the penalty for suppression of turnover was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161287</link>
      <description>The court upheld the levy of purchase tax on the sale of chillies under section 7-A of the TNGST Act, confirming it as a local sale and the penultimate sale under section 5(3) of the CST Act. The tax on the sale of jaggery was also upheld due to lack of proof of export. However, the penalty for suppression of turnover was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>