<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 742 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161286</link>
    <description>In a sales tax exemption notification, the negative-list entry for industries based on ethanol or ethyl alcohol was construed according to its plain language. The Court treated the phrase &quot;except non-molasses alcohol industries&quot; as an exception limited to that main clause and held that &quot;based on&quot; refers to industries using ethyl alcohol as an input, not to units manufacturing it. On that reading, a unit manufacturing ethyl alcohol from molasses does not fall within the negative list. The exemption could not be denied on that ground, because a broader construction would make the word &quot;based&quot; redundant and extend the exception beyond its proper scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:08:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 742 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161286</link>
      <description>In a sales tax exemption notification, the negative-list entry for industries based on ethanol or ethyl alcohol was construed according to its plain language. The Court treated the phrase &quot;except non-molasses alcohol industries&quot; as an exception limited to that main clause and held that &quot;based on&quot; refers to industries using ethyl alcohol as an input, not to units manufacturing it. On that reading, a unit manufacturing ethyl alcohol from molasses does not fall within the negative list. The exemption could not be denied on that ground, because a broader construction would make the word &quot;based&quot; redundant and extend the exception beyond its proper scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>